<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Marc&#039;s thoughts on Dell Storage Solutions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marcmalotke.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marcmalotke.net</link>
	<description>Marking my territory on the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 19:04:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NEW: Introducing the Dell DR4000 with De-Dupe, Compression and Replication by Marc Malotke</title>
		<link>http://marcmalotke.net/2012/02/16/new-introducing-the-dell-dr4000-with-de-dupe-compression-and-replication/#comment-1361</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marc Malotke]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 19:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://marcmalotke.wordpress.com/?p=484#comment-1361</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good Day....

Please review the link and information on the DR4000 which is specifically for backup.  This is not a Production SAN like EqualLogic or Compellent.

Thank you.
Marc]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good Day&#8230;.</p>
<p>Please review the link and information on the DR4000 which is specifically for backup.  This is not a Production SAN like EqualLogic or Compellent.</p>
<p>Thank you.<br />
Marc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NEW: Introducing the Dell DR4000 with De-Dupe, Compression and Replication by Magnus</title>
		<link>http://marcmalotke.net/2012/02/16/new-introducing-the-dell-dr4000-with-de-dupe-compression-and-replication/#comment-1360</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Magnus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 19:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://marcmalotke.wordpress.com/?p=484#comment-1360</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is it online dedupe?  
Maybe possible to have as online-SAN for VMs or fileserver?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it online dedupe?<br />
Maybe possible to have as online-SAN for VMs or fileserver?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EqualLogic Questions by Marc Malotke</title>
		<link>http://marcmalotke.net/equallogic-questions/#comment-1358</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marc Malotke]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marcmalotke.wordpress.com/equallogic-questions/#comment-1358</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good Day....

Going through Dell is the only official way that I know of to accomplish what you would like to do.

Thank you.
Marc]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good Day&#8230;.</p>
<p>Going through Dell is the only official way that I know of to accomplish what you would like to do.</p>
<p>Thank you.<br />
Marc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EqualLogic Questions by Joseph Le</title>
		<link>http://marcmalotke.net/equallogic-questions/#comment-1357</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Le]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marcmalotke.wordpress.com/equallogic-questions/#comment-1357</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello,

We bought two Equallogic 300E units from an auction for a few thousand dollars.   In our lab, we found out that all four controllers don&#039;t have the firmware flash cards in them.  As a result, we could not boot the units, the fan LEDs are red and the controllers do not engage (ACT LED not green).

We had access to working controllers from other 300E units and we did the following tests:

1.  Took controllers from existing working units and put them in the just-bought units.   Worked!  This confirms that both just-bought units are fine except that they don&#039;t have the firmware.

2.  Took the compact flash cards from existing working units and put them in the controllers of the just-bought units.  Does not work!  This confirms that the firmware versions are different.

I would like to know how I can get the proper firmware for these controllers.  Do you know anybody that can fix them for a reasonable price. 

We contacted Dell and it would cost around 3K to put each unit under warranty.   We can afford this price tag and we intended to use them for testing.

Thanks in advance.

Regards,
Joseph]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<p>We bought two Equallogic 300E units from an auction for a few thousand dollars.   In our lab, we found out that all four controllers don&#8217;t have the firmware flash cards in them.  As a result, we could not boot the units, the fan LEDs are red and the controllers do not engage (ACT LED not green).</p>
<p>We had access to working controllers from other 300E units and we did the following tests:</p>
<p>1.  Took controllers from existing working units and put them in the just-bought units.   Worked!  This confirms that both just-bought units are fine except that they don&#8217;t have the firmware.</p>
<p>2.  Took the compact flash cards from existing working units and put them in the controllers of the just-bought units.  Does not work!  This confirms that the firmware versions are different.</p>
<p>I would like to know how I can get the proper firmware for these controllers.  Do you know anybody that can fix them for a reasonable price. </p>
<p>We contacted Dell and it would cost around 3K to put each unit under warranty.   We can afford this price tag and we intended to use them for testing.</p>
<p>Thanks in advance.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Joseph</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EqualLogic Questions by Ryan</title>
		<link>http://marcmalotke.net/equallogic-questions/#comment-1334</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 20:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marcmalotke.wordpress.com/equallogic-questions/#comment-1334</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I need to increase the hard drives on an EqualLogic PS4000, because one of the boxes is out of drive space.  It has roughly 3% of free space now.  My customer has a second PS4000 set in a Colo that is replicating snapshots and critical data and has roughly 65% of free space.  
What is the best process for migrating the data off the box, increasing the hard drive sizes and restoring the volumes?  
The drives are 250GB each and all 16 are being used in a RAID 50 configuration.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I need to increase the hard drives on an EqualLogic PS4000, because one of the boxes is out of drive space.  It has roughly 3% of free space now.  My customer has a second PS4000 set in a Colo that is replicating snapshots and critical data and has roughly 65% of free space.<br />
What is the best process for migrating the data off the box, increasing the hard drive sizes and restoring the volumes?<br />
The drives are 250GB each and all 16 are being used in a RAID 50 configuration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EqualLogic Questions by Marc Malotke</title>
		<link>http://marcmalotke.net/equallogic-questions/#comment-1322</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marc Malotke]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 16:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marcmalotke.wordpress.com/equallogic-questions/#comment-1322</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good Day....

A Single Array can only be configure with a single raid type.  In this case your PS4000 can either be configured with R10 or R50, not both.

Hopefully you are running the latest version of SANHQ and EqualLogic Firmware.  With SANHQ you can review the RAID Simulator which will show what the performance would be of your current array if you converted from R10 to R50.  You can convert your single array from R10 to R50 without any downtime.  The conversion will take a while and run in the background.  You cannot go from R50 to R10 so please remember this if you convert from R10 to R50.

Thank you.
Marc]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good Day&#8230;.</p>
<p>A Single Array can only be configure with a single raid type.  In this case your PS4000 can either be configured with R10 or R50, not both.</p>
<p>Hopefully you are running the latest version of SANHQ and EqualLogic Firmware.  With SANHQ you can review the RAID Simulator which will show what the performance would be of your current array if you converted from R10 to R50.  You can convert your single array from R10 to R50 without any downtime.  The conversion will take a while and run in the background.  You cannot go from R50 to R10 so please remember this if you convert from R10 to R50.</p>
<p>Thank you.<br />
Marc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EqualLogic Questions by Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://marcmalotke.net/equallogic-questions/#comment-1321</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeremy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 16:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marcmalotke.wordpress.com/equallogic-questions/#comment-1321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Marc,

We have a PS4000vx and we are running Vmware 4.1 with 10-15 different servers one of them which is an SQL2008 server. My question is we are running RAID 10 right now but are wanting to change a few things up for extra space. I was thinking about converting it to RAID 50 but am unsure of the performance loss from RAID 10. But then I saw that you can change the RAID based on the volume.

So is it possible to change the entire storage group to RAID 50 giving us more space. But then creating a volume and making it RAID 10 for our more IO intensive servers? Would that give us the space we need and the performance we want?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marc,</p>
<p>We have a PS4000vx and we are running Vmware 4.1 with 10-15 different servers one of them which is an SQL2008 server. My question is we are running RAID 10 right now but are wanting to change a few things up for extra space. I was thinking about converting it to RAID 50 but am unsure of the performance loss from RAID 10. But then I saw that you can change the RAID based on the volume.</p>
<p>So is it possible to change the entire storage group to RAID 50 giving us more space. But then creating a volume and making it RAID 10 for our more IO intensive servers? Would that give us the space we need and the performance we want?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EqualLogic Questions by Marc Malotke</title>
		<link>http://marcmalotke.net/equallogic-questions/#comment-1320</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marc Malotke]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 15:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marcmalotke.wordpress.com/equallogic-questions/#comment-1320</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good Day....

Please contact EqualLogic Support.  Since you have PowerConnect switches, EqualLogic Support can assist in confirming the correct setup.

Thank you.
Marc]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good Day&#8230;.</p>
<p>Please contact EqualLogic Support.  Since you have PowerConnect switches, EqualLogic Support can assist in confirming the correct setup.</p>
<p>Thank you.<br />
Marc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EqualLogic Questions by Tom</title>
		<link>http://marcmalotke.net/equallogic-questions/#comment-1319</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marcmalotke.wordpress.com/equallogic-questions/#comment-1319</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mark,

My company just purchased a Dell PS6100 with two PowerConnect 6224&#039;s to create our first SAN as we were in need of a storage solution. I am tasked with putting it all together and trying to follow best practice but lots of information second guesses itself. The SAN network will be isolated, with the exception of the port for management, and the two 6224&#039;s are going to be stacked. In terms of setting up the ports on the stack, there is conflicting information regarding Portfast and Spanning Tree Protocol. Some documentation says to enable portfast and some says not to. The eight ports from the PS6100 will be split between both 6224&#039;s. Also, each server has 2 ports that will go out to each of the 6224&#039;s as well. When configuring the switch, what is the optimal configuration that I should be working with?

Thanks!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,</p>
<p>My company just purchased a Dell PS6100 with two PowerConnect 6224&#8242;s to create our first SAN as we were in need of a storage solution. I am tasked with putting it all together and trying to follow best practice but lots of information second guesses itself. The SAN network will be isolated, with the exception of the port for management, and the two 6224&#8242;s are going to be stacked. In terms of setting up the ports on the stack, there is conflicting information regarding Portfast and Spanning Tree Protocol. Some documentation says to enable portfast and some says not to. The eight ports from the PS6100 will be split between both 6224&#8242;s. Also, each server has 2 ports that will go out to each of the 6224&#8242;s as well. When configuring the switch, what is the optimal configuration that I should be working with?</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EqualLogic Questions by amitj78</title>
		<link>http://marcmalotke.net/equallogic-questions/#comment-1316</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[amitj78]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 20:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marcmalotke.wordpress.com/equallogic-questions/#comment-1316</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have a question about storage vMotions with Equallogics and vSphere5.  Our ESXi hosts are connected to the Equallogic groups through iSCSI, and they have the vSphere HITKIT and MEM installed.  I transferred a 30GB VM from one datatstore to another and it took almost 30 minutes.  How can this be sped up?  It appears from looking at the iSCSI usage graphs on the ESXi host that very minimal traffic is being used during the transfer, indicating that the Equallogics are handling the transfer and it is not going through the ESXi host.  There is some traffic, but just enough to indicate that it is checking that the data is being transferred properly, but not actually performing the transfer itself.  Do you have any insights into this?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a question about storage vMotions with Equallogics and vSphere5.  Our ESXi hosts are connected to the Equallogic groups through iSCSI, and they have the vSphere HITKIT and MEM installed.  I transferred a 30GB VM from one datatstore to another and it took almost 30 minutes.  How can this be sped up?  It appears from looking at the iSCSI usage graphs on the ESXi host that very minimal traffic is being used during the transfer, indicating that the Equallogics are handling the transfer and it is not going through the ESXi host.  There is some traffic, but just enough to indicate that it is checking that the data is being transferred properly, but not actually performing the transfer itself.  Do you have any insights into this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
